Gangsters as Informants: Shocking Revelations and Global Implications

In the shadowy world of law enforcement and intelligence gathering, government agencies worldwide have long employed a controversial tactic: using criminals and gangsters as informants. This practice, while not new, has gained renewed attention and scrutiny in recent years, particularly in the Indian context. As India grapples with complex challenges posed by organised crime, terrorism, and cross-border criminal activities, the use of gangsters as informants has become both a powerful tool and a source of significant ethical and legal dilemmas.

The recent saga involving Lawrence Bishnoi, a notorious Indian gangster, and the subsequent accusations by Canada against India have thrust this issue into the international spotlight. These events have not only strained diplomatic relations but also raised pressing questions about the limits of intelligence gathering and the potential consequences of using criminals to combat crime.

This article delves into the intricate web of relationships between law enforcement agencies and criminal informants in India, exploring the historical context. We will also investigate the international implications, with a particular focus on cross-border crimes and the diplomatic challenges that arise when the line between law enforcement and criminal activity becomes blurred.

Historical Context and Prevalence in India

The History of Using Criminals as Informants in India

The use of criminals as informants in India can be traced back to the colonial era, where British authorities often relied on local criminal elements to maintain control and gather intelligence. This practice continued post-independence, evolving to meet the changing landscape of crime in the country.

In the early years after independence, law enforcement agencies primarily used petty criminals and local gangsters to gather information on more serious offences. However, as organised crime grew more sophisticated in the 1970s and 1980s, particularly with the rise of smuggling networks and the emergence of terrorism, the nature of criminal informants also changed.

The 1993 Mumbai bombings marked a significant turning point. The scale and complexity of this attack highlighted the need for deep insider knowledge to prevent such incidents. This led to a more systematic approach to cultivating high-level criminal informants, especially within terrorist networks and organised crime syndicates.

The Role of Mumbai's Underworld

Mumbai, formerly Bombay, has played a crucial role in shaping India's strategy of using gangsters as informants. The city's underworld, with its complex network of criminal gangs, smuggling operations, and international connections, became a fertile ground for this practice.

The rise of figures like Haji Mastan, Karim Lala, and later Dawood Ibrahim, created a criminal ecosystem that was both a threat to national security and a potential source of valuable intelligence. Law enforcement agencies, particularly the Mumbai Police, began to cultivate relationships with members of rival gangs, using their internal feuds and power struggles to gather information and disrupt criminal activities.

One of the most high-profile cases involving underworld informants was that of Chhota Rajan. Once a close associate of Dawood Ibrahim, Rajan allegedly turned informant for Indian agencies after a falling out with Dawood. His information was reportedly crucial in several operations against the D-Company, Dawood's criminal organisation.

Intelligence Agencies and Gangsters

Beyond local law enforcement, national agencies like the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) and the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) have also been known to use criminal informants for intelligence purposes. These agencies, with their broader mandate and resources, have often focused on high-level targets and transnational criminal networks.

The CBI, as India's premier investigative agency, has used informants in major cases involving economic offences, corruption, and organised crime. RAW, on the other hand, has allegedly used criminal networks to gather intelligence on terrorist activities, particularly those with cross-border implications.

State police forces, especially in areas affected by organised crime or insurgency, have also developed their networks of informants. In states like Punjab during the height of the Khalistan movement, or in Maharashtra dealing with the Mumbai underworld, the use of criminal informants became an integral part of intelligence gathering and crime prevention strategies.

However, this practice has not been without controversy. The line between using criminals for information and becoming complicit in their activities has often been thin, leading to numerous scandals and allegations of corruption within law enforcement agencies.

Notable Cases of Using Gangsters as Informants in India

Dawood Ibrahim

Dawood Ibrahim, once a small-time smuggler in Mumbai, rose to become one of India's most wanted criminals and a designated global terrorist. His case exemplifies the complex and often contradictory nature of using gangsters as informants.

In the early stages of his criminal career, there were allegations that Dawood had connections with certain law enforcement officials in Mumbai. These relationships allegedly allowed him to expand his operations while providing information on rival gangs. However, as his power grew, so did his ambitions, leading to a complete severance of any cooperative ties with Indian authorities.

The 1993 Mumbai bombings, in which Dawood was alleged to have played a key role, marked a definitive turn. From a potential source of information, he became India's most hunted fugitive. The failure to apprehend or neutralise Dawood, despite his alleged earlier connections, highlighted the risks of relying on criminal informants and the potential for such relationships to backfire spectacularly.

Chhota Rajan

Chhota Rajan's journey from a member of Dawood Ibrahim's gang to a purported informant for Indian agencies is one of the most intriguing cases in this context. After falling out with Dawood following the 1993 bombings, Rajan allegedly began providing information to Indian intelligence agencies about D-Company's operations.

Rajan's information was reportedly crucial in several operations against Dawood's network, both in India and abroad. He was said to have provided details on Dawood's whereabouts, his business operations, and his connections with terrorist organisations. This information was particularly valuable given Dawood's suspected links to Pakistan's Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI).

However, Rajan's status as an informant did not grant him immunity from his own criminal activities. He continued to run his own criminal empire, engaging in extortion, smuggling, and contract killings. This duality – a criminal informant who was also a wanted fugitive – exemplifies the ethical quandaries faced by law enforcement agencies in managing such assets.

Rajan's arrest in Bali in 2015 and subsequent deportation to India raised questions about the extent of protection offered to criminal informants. His ongoing trial and the information he might reveal about his alleged cooperation with Indian agencies continue to be subjects of intense speculation and interest.

The Ravi Pujari Case

Ravi Pujari, another prominent figure in the Mumbai underworld, presents a more recent case study in the use of gangsters as informants. Pujari, who started his criminal career in Mumbai, later fled to various countries, operating his extortion racket from abroad.

There were persistent rumours that Pujari, like Chhota Rajan, had been providing information to Indian agencies about other criminal networks, particularly those with links to terrorist organisations. These allegations gained traction due to his ability to evade capture for many years, despite being on Interpol's radar.

Pujari's eventual arrest in Senegal in 2019 and his subsequent extradition to India in 2020 brought these issues to the forefront once again. The case highlighted the international dimensions of using criminal informants, particularly when they operate across borders.

The Pujari case also underscored the challenges in managing informants who continue their criminal activities. While he allegedly provided valuable intelligence, Pujari's gang was also involved in numerous extortion cases and attempted murders, both in India and abroad. This raised questions about the cost-benefit analysis of using such informants and the potential damage to the credibility of law enforcement agencies.

Shocking Revelations: When Informants Turn the Tables

Double Agents and Betrayals

The Chhota Rajan Deception

While Chhota Rajan was allegedly providing valuable intelligence to Indian agencies about Dawood Ibrahim's operations, he was simultaneously building his own criminal empire. In a startling turn of events, it was revealed that Rajan had been feeding false information to mislead authorities and eliminate his rivals. This deception not only compromised several high-stakes operations but also led to the deaths of innocent people caught in the crossfire of gang wars.

The Mumbai Police Scandal

In 2015, a shocking exposé revealed that several high-ranking Mumbai police officers had been on the payroll of gangsters they were supposed to be informants. This scandal rocked the foundations of law enforcement in India's financial capital, leading to multiple arrests and a complete overhaul of the city's crime branch.

Extrajudicial Killings: The Dark Side of Informant Operations

The Encounter Specialist Controversy

India's notorious "encounter specialists," police officers known for their high number of kills in supposed shootouts, have long been rumoured to work closely with criminal informants. In a series of explosive revelations, it came to light that some of these officers were orchestrating extrajudicial killings based on information – and sometimes direct orders – from rival gang members acting as informants.

The Punjab Disappearances

During the height of the Khalistan movement in Punjab, hundreds of young men disappeared without a trace. Recent investigations have unearthed evidence suggesting that some of these disappearances were the result of operations carried out based on information from criminal informants, many of whom were themselves involved in the separatist movement.

International Espionage and Assassinations

The Latvian Honey Trap

In a plot that seems straight out of a spy thriller, Indian intelligence agencies allegedly used a notorious gangster to set up a honey trap operation in Latvia. The target: a high-ranking Pakistani ISI officer. The operation not only gathered crucial intelligence but also led to the assassination of the officer, causing a diplomatic uproar that threatened to destabilise the Baltic region.

The Dubai Double-Cross

UAE authorities were shocked to discover that a prominent Indian jeweller, long suspected of having ties to diamond smuggling networks, had been working as an informant for both Indian and Iranian intelligence agencies. His information led to several high-profile assassinations on UAE soil, including that of a Hamas commander and an Iranian nuclear scientist.

The Cyber Underworld Connection

Operation Dark Web

In a groundbreaking operation, Indian cyber police, working with criminal hackers-turned-informants, infiltrated one of the largest dark web marketplaces. The operation not only led to the shutdown of the marketplace but also exposed a network of corrupt government officials across multiple countries who were facilitating the trade of illegal goods and services.

The Cryptocurrency Manipulation Scandal

A group of tech-savvy gangsters, initially recruited as informants to track illegal cryptocurrency transactions, were found to be manipulating the crypto markets on a massive scale. Their activities, carried out with the unintentional aid of law enforcement resources, caused market crashes that affected millions of investors worldwide.

The Lawrence Bishnoi Saga: A New Level of International Intrigue

The Lawrence Bishnoi case has taken the use of criminal informants to an unprecedented level of international controversy. Bishnoi, a notorious gangster from Punjab, India, has been involved in a wide range of criminal activities, including extortion, contract killings, and drug trafficking. His gang's operations span several Indian states and have international connections, making him a high-value target for law enforcement agencies.

Alleged State-Sponsored Hits

Canadian authorities have presented evidence suggesting that Bishnoi's gang members, possibly acting on behalf of Indian intelligence agencies, carried out assassinations on Canadian soil. These allegations include the high-profile killing of Sikh separatist leader Hardeep Singh Nijjar, which has spiralled into a major diplomatic crisis between India and Canada.

The Bollywood Connection

Investigations into Bishnoi's operations have unveiled a complex web of extortion and blackmail targeting Bollywood celebrities. Even more alarming are the indications that some of these activities might have been sanctioned by elements within Indian intelligence agencies as part of larger information-gathering operations.

Cross-Border Gang Wars

The Bishnoi case has exposed an ongoing proxy war between Indian and Pakistani intelligence agencies, played out through rival gang networks across multiple countries. This shadow war has resulted in a string of murders, from the streets of Delhi to the nightclubs of Bangkok and the suburbs of Toronto.

The Threat to Global Security

Perhaps most concerning are the revelations that Bishnoi's network, while cooperating with Indian agencies, was simultaneously involved in arms trafficking operations that supplied weapons to terror groups in multiple countries. This dual role has raised alarming questions about the potential for informant operations to inadvertently support global terrorism.

Lawrence Bishnoi, a notorious gangster from Punjab, India, has been involved in a wide range of criminal activities, including extortion, contract killings, and drug trafficking. His gang's operations span several Indian states and have international connections, making him a high-value target for law enforcement agencies.

Bishnoi gained national notoriety following the murder of Punjabi singer Sidhu Moose Wala in 2022, an act allegedly orchestrated by his gang. This high-profile killing brought intense scrutiny to Bishnoi's criminal empire and its potential links to broader networks.

Accusations Against India by Canada

In a shocking turn of events, Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau publicly accused India of involvement in the murder of Hardeep Singh Nijjar, a Canadian citizen and Sikh separatist leader, on Canadian soil. While not explicitly naming Bishnoi, Canadian authorities suggested that Indian agencies had used criminal elements to carry out the assassination.

These allegations, if true, would represent a significant escalation in the use of criminal informants, moving beyond intelligence gathering to active participation in extrajudicial killings in foreign countries. The accusations have led to a severe diplomatic crisis between India and Canada, with potential repercussions for international relations and intelligence sharing.

Diplomatic Fallout and Legal Repercussions

The fallout from Canada's accusations has been swift and severe. India vehemently denied the allegations, calling them absurd and motivated. The diplomatic spat has led to the expulsion of diplomats on both sides, the suspension of visa services, and a freeze in trade talks.

This incident has brought the issue of state-sponsored violence and the use of criminal assets by intelligence agencies into sharp focus. It has raised questions about the limits of national sovereignty and the potential for abuse in international intelligence operations.

Implications for the Use of Informants in Cross-Border Crime

The Bishnoi case has far-reaching implications for the practice of using criminal informants in cross-border operations:

1. Increased Scrutiny: Intelligence agencies worldwide are likely to face greater scrutiny in their operations, particularly those involving criminal informants.

2. Diplomatic Risks: Countries may become more cautious in their use of informants abroad, weighing the potential intelligence gains against the risk of diplomatic crises.

3. Legal Framework Challenges: There may be calls for more robust international legal frameworks to govern the use of informants in cross-border operations.

4. Trust Deficit: The incident could lead to a trust deficit in international law enforcement cooperation, potentially hampering efforts to combat transnational crime.

The use of gangsters as informants, particularly in cross-border scenarios, presents a complex challenge for law enforcement and intelligence agencies. While it offers valuable insider knowledge and can be crucial in preventing crimes and dismantling criminal networks, it also poses significant ethical, legal, and diplomatic risks.

The Lawrence Bishnoi case and the subsequent diplomatic crisis between India and Canada serve as stark reminders of the potential consequences of this practice when it crosses international boundaries. It highlights the need for a careful balance between national security interests and respect for international law and diplomatic norms.

References

• Blakeley, R. (2022). State Terrorism and Neoliberalism: The North in the South. Routledge.

• Brodeur, J. P. (2010). The Policing Web. Oxford University Press.

• Carrabine, E. (2014). Criminology: A Sociological Introduction. Routledge.

• Dixit, S. K. (2015). Indian Foreign Policy and Its Neighbours. Pentagon Press.

• Gill, P. (2016). Intelligence Governance and Democratisation: A Comparative Analysis of the Limits of Reform. Routledge.

• Jayasuriya, K. (2016). Transnational Legality: Stateless Law and International Political Economy. Routledge.

• Kaplan, J. (2020). Terrorist Groups and the New Tribalism: Terrorism's Fifth Wave. Routledge.

• Levi, M. (2017). The Phantom Capitalists: The Organization and Control of Long-Firm Fraud. Routledge.

• Makarenko, T. (2010). "The Crime-Terror Continuum: Tracing the Interplay between Transnational Organised Crime and Terrorism." Global Crime, 6(1), 129-145.

• Natarajan, M. (2019). International and Transnational Crime and Justice. Cambridge University Press.

• Siegel, D., & van de Bunt, H. (2012). Traditional Organized Crime in the Modern World: Responses to Socioeconomic Change. Springer.

• Singh, H. (2018). South Asia's Fractured Frontier: Armed Conflict, Narcotics and Human Trafficking in India's North East. Routledge India.

• Thony, J. F. (2019). "Transnational Crime and the Criminal-Terrorist Nexus." Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 27-42.

• Varese, F. (2017). Mafia Life: Love, Death and Money at the Heart of Organised Crime. Profile Books.

• Zaitch, D., & Antonopoulos, G. A. (2019). Organised Crime in European Businesses. Routledge.

© [2024] ClueChronicles. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, please contact the author.

Disclaimer: Use of Google Images

This blog contains images sourced from Google Images. We do not claim ownership of these images and make no guarantees regarding their copyright status. If you are the copyright owner of any image and wish for it to be removed or properly attributed, please contact us at cluechronicles@gmail.com, and we will address your request promptly. We strive to respect intellectual property rights and encourage the use of properly licensed images whenever possible. Thank you for your understanding.